On March 1st, according to domestic media reports, a claim that "sea fish are more nutritious than freshwater fish" has been circulating online, sparking interest among netizens.
So, is this claim true? Nutrition experts have weighed in:
From the perspective of modern nutrition, both sea fish and freshwater fish are rich in proteins, fats, minerals, and vitamins, which are beneficial to human health.
In terms of protein content, there isn't much difference between the two. However, it's generally observed that most sea fish have a higher DHA content.
But, some freshwater fish also have a high DHA content, such as bass, carp, and sturgeon. In fact, the DHA content in bass is even higher than that in common sea fish like salmon, hairtail, and yellow croaker.
In summary, whether it's sea fish or freshwater fish, fish meat is an excellent source of high-quality protein, and there's not much difference in nutritional content. You can choose based on your preference.
However, it's important to note that for individuals with gout, it's advised to opt for freshwater fish. Sea fish contain higher levels of purines than freshwater fish, and purines metabolize into uric acid in the body. Consuming too much can exacerbate the condition.
Nonetheless, some netizens argue that sea fish contain slightly higher vitamins and minerals than freshwater fish, and they taste fresher, with better muscle elasticity and texture.
Do you agree with the netizens?
